Wow, Justin Bieber was arrested. Anyone surprised by this? I'm not. Not one bit. The little tyke was bound to be arrested sooner or later what with the behavior he's been exhibiting recently. It's usually the type of behavior that ends up getting people arrested. Guess he's learning celebrities aren't above the law.
Guys, I'm not a fan of Justin Bieber. Never have been, never will be. I don't follow stories about him because I don't care for him. I only know about this arrest because the internet has been blowing up about it. I don't know if this is his first or second arrest, but I do know he deserved the arrest.
Anyone who drives drunk, resists arrest, drives without a valid license, and is racing his vehicle deserves to be arrested. I don't care how much money they have or how famous they are. Not to mention he was on drugs at the time.
He and his racing partner were driving at least 30 miles above the speed limit in a residential area! That is dangerous and stupid.
So now that we got that covered and we all understand it's a bad thing to do, let's move on to what I'm really talking about: our reaction. That's right, folks. The way we have reacted to this not shocking news is ridiculous.
So this photo has made lot of people angry. Does it make you angry? People are upset he had the guts to compare himself to Michael Jackson. But, is he he really? Does posting a photo of him and MJ mean he's comparing their music? Not really. If anything, he's comparing their release from prison. And everyone's whining about it! They're mad he "compared" himself to Michael Jackson who was being released from prison for charges of child molestation.
Honestly, I think it's silly to be mad about this. Who really cares? This is hardly important.
Here's a picture of his mugshot, though, where he's giving us all a big old grin. Now, I don't want to judge or anything, maybe the kid is just used to smiling in front of a camera and did so without thinking....but, still. It's a mugshot. He is guilty of endangering the lives of others and he's grinning about it.
Bieber does such a great job of showing how not to behave when getting arrested and how to not to pose when getting a mugshot. I wonder what's going through his mind. Is he trying to show us all he doesn't care? Because he absolutely should care and learn a very important from all this.
One of the worst parts of this whole mess is the beliebers. It's really disgusting how they've reacted to this, coming out and vowing to support him no matter what. Look kids, you can be a fan of this dude's music as long as you want, but we do not ever support drunk driving no matter who is doing it! And we don't support people's decisions to be a jerk, either.
There were was a horrible tweet by @justegirlthings "joking'" about how they would always support him even to the day he decided to shoot up a school. Absolutely disgusting. It's bad enough to support someone for driving drunk but when you go as far to even "joke" about supporting them when they shoot up a school, there's a real problem. #FreeBieber was actually a trending topic. You beliebers just don't get it.
Justin Bieber did something wrong. It was very bad and extremely dangerous. We don't want to free people who do those things. We want them to be arrested so they don't kill anyone. I don't care if he's your favorite singer, he's subject to the same laws you and I are and he must abide by them.
Let me put it this way for those of you who still don't get it: If my favorite celebrity did something as stupid as drunk driving, I might still enjoy their talent, but I would definitely not support their decision. I would want them to be arrested and to accept the harsh and rightfully deserved consequences of doing something so dangerous.
You're free to listen to his music, but do you really want to support drunk driving? What does that say about you?
Thank god he's quitting music, though. I've had enough of him. Just wanted to throw that in there.
Can you guess who/what this post is covering? Yes, good job. Miss Miley Cyrus has caught the attention of Miss Opinionated. But, that's not surprising. It seems she has has captured the attention of the entire nation and goodness knows why! Who would have guessed that sweet little Hannah Montana would end up portraying herself as nothing more than a sick sexual pervert?
We all knew she would grow up one day. She couldn't be Hannah forever. Growing up was inevitable. Now, after all these years, I find myself asking: did she actually grow up at all? She is certainly older, but I would not call her behavior grown up. Sad to say that I think Hannah Montana is more grown up than Miley Cyrus.
The evolution of her image is actually quite stunning.
She started as this:
At this stage, she was a sweet, beautiful, respectful and happy young lady that I would see as a role model for, really, anyone. She was always smiling and always happy. Something that we need more of in this world. She was, as a role model, pure and decent and someone to look up to.
And then we had this:
Okay, she's growing up and maturing. She is making more serious music, she has a movie, she looks like she's on the right track. Still a decent girl with pleasant music that gives inspiring messages, which are the best kind. Still someone I would be proud to have my child (if I had any) aspire to be like. At the this point, she was the kind of celebrity we needed. She was a mainstream music artist that didn't sing about sex or drugs and gave us something to think about. She was different.
Then this happened:
Obviously, she wanted a more a dangerous edge to her image. This was a little strange, but I didn't think much of it. She was just trying to get rid of her Hannah Montana image. Less of a role model, less original, less inspiring. Certainly not someone to look up to. She was now just another music artist. Exactly like the others.
And now:
I can only think of a few words to describe this. Shameful, awful, horrifying, trashy, disgusting. Someone get this little girl out of the limelight. It has destroyed her. Where is that inspiring, beautiful music artist she was just a year or two ago? Miley has obviously done away with her to become a much less attractive and admirable whatever this is. If you haven't seen her 2013 VMA performance, this is a photo from it. I highly recommend you don't watch it. It's nothing special. You'll regret it as it will be five minutes of your life that you won't get back. She's not worth it.
She has thrown away her originality to become another clone of the Britney Spears, Lady Gaga, sexual pervert type that we don't need another of. We really don't. Someone please show us that there is more to people than being sexy. Although there are many words I would use to describe Miss Cyrus, sexy is not one of them, though she is desperately striving to be just that. It's very sad. People think that the greatest achievement in life is to be considered sexy and celebrities like Miley Cyrus don't help with that horrible idea. They promote it.
So, what to do? How to react? My friends, I don't know. We really can't do anything. Although maybe if we responded less positively or acted less interested in her repulsive behavior, she would stop twerking (so disgusted that's an actual thing) around in her underwear. Seriously, the image is not attractive. It gives me nightmares.
Though it may sound like it, I have never actually been a fan of Miley Cyrus. I didn't hate her and she didn't disgust me on every possible level as is the case today, but I wasn't a fan. She has a pretty voice and I thought she had some real potential. But she has thrown away all potential she had to be something great.
What she doesn't understand is, right now, she might be the topic of discussion and everyone knows who she is and what she does, but five, ten years from now, we will be saying Miley Who? She has not made a lasting imprint or done anything memorable. Soon, we will forget all about her. There are great musicians we will remember forever who never had to twerk to get noticed. A few examples: The Beatles, Billy Joel, Elton John, Frank Sinatra, Amy Whinehouse, Aretha Franklin, Johnny Cash, Freddy Mercury, Van Halen, The Rolling Stones and that's not all. But Miley Cyrus will never be one of those people. She will be stuck on the list with people we won't know in ten years like Britney Spears, Amanda Bynes, Lindsay Lohan and the Kardashians. In six or seven months, no one will care about her VMA performance anymore. Sure, we might be shocked right after it happens and have a few words to say on the subject, but tomorrow, we won't even remember it because it's not worth remembering.
The sad truth is that she is a young lady that does not act like a lady and she is proud of the fact. She thinks she's "being herself," but I don't think so. I think she's doing whatever she can to get attention be it positive or negative. So, any young ladies who have been a faithful of Miley since she started, please, please, please, give her no more attention. Think nothing more of her. She has not done anything that anyone should be proud of. She is disgusting and not any type of role model. You are better than that. You don't need her. There are plenty of people out there that have good music and act decent at the same time. People we shouldn't feel ashamed to respect and love. Miley, sadly, is not one of them.
So, now that I've addressed our reaction to Miley, what do I think she needs? A lot. Miley needs a lot of things. First off, she needs Jesus. Badly. She might not be able to be tamed, but she needs to be tamed. She needs a good old fashioned spanking. She needs her parents to put their foot down. She needs to put her clothes on and keep her tongue in her mouth. She needs to stop the indecent behavior. She needs to stop with the disgusting and highly inappropriate music videos.
I don't know if you've seen her We Can't Stop or Wrecking Ball videos, but I suggest you don't watch them. They are a waste of life. Miley obviously knows how she wants to be seen and it is not how anyone, anywhere should ever want to be seen. I don't know if she realizes it, but she has disgusted the entire country. More people hate what she has become than approve of it. She's not famous because people adore her, she's famous because people hate her. Even other celebrities are appalled at her.
Rhianna, One Direction, Taylor Swift and Selena Gomez react to Miley Cyrus' horrendous VMA performance.
Others tweeted their thoughts:
"I just watched the #VMAs & I know I'm going to have nightmares about Miley Cyrus playing a tiny harp where her "red light area" is." - Jesse Tyler Ferguson
"Things I learned watching the#VMAs2013: There's nothing you can do with a foam finger that you can't air on MTV." - James Van Der Beek
"Watching VMAs. Haven't been in a strip club in a while, but good to see nothing has changed" - Bill Maher
Brooke Sheilds, who played Miley's mother in some Hannah Montana episodes responded by saying, "I was Hannah Montana's mother. I do not approve. Where did I go wrong? I just want to know who's advising her and why it's necessary? Our children can't watch that. I feel like it's a bit desperate."
More like A LOT desperate.
That Parents Television Council was extremely upset with the performance and even Miley's team was a little shocked. A source close to her said, "They saw the rehearsals, but those were really played down compared to the live performance."
So, say what you will about her, but she has certainly gone downhill. She is someone we don't need to see anymore of. She doesn't needs fans, she needs a time out. Just....I don't know....pray for her. She needs help. Lots of help.
Cult: A relatively small group of people having religious beliefs or practices regarded by others as strange or sinister.
Westboro Baptist Church claims a lot of things, but one thing they don't claim is they they are a cult. However, according to the above definition, it is easily seen that a cult is exactly what they are. In fact, they fit that definition so well that we could just as easily put this in the dictionary:
Cult: Westboro Baptist Church
and no other explanation would be needed. If anyone wanted more detail, all they would have to do is look up said cult.
Why am I writing on Westboro Baptist, you may be wondering. No, I haven't seen any recent news on them but that doesn't change the fact that I HATE THEIR SLIMY GUTS! Okay, maybe I shouldn't be so harsh, but they are a hard group of people to love.
If you've never heard of these people then lucky you. Life is better when you don't know they exist. You would be happier if you didn't finish reading this post....but I can't stop you. All I can do is warn you.
I don't remember how I first heard about this cult but I think it was on YouTube. I was watching some sort of video and they happened to start talking about this church. The things they said about the church were awful and horrifying. They slammed the church and the things they claimed the church did and said. I figured if the church was truly all they were saying then the church deserved this. I looked up the church. I watched their videos and read their website and to my horror they were ten times more horrible than the video had claimed. The people in the video hadn't been harsh enough!
Now you're probably wondering (if you're unfamiliar with them) what they could possibly do that is so terrible. Don't worry, I'm about to tell you. Brace yourself.
The church is relatively small made up of seventy-something or eighty-something people. Not surprisingly, most of them are related in some way. So it's basically a church made up of one big family.
This cult is the most hateful group of people I have ever heard of and they don't hide their hatred. They make their hatred very public. They hate everyone on the planet except themselves. Everyone, except them, is going to hell. Or so they believe.
The church regularly travels around the country "warning" people of God's wrath and how we are all headed to hell. They picket everything. Funerals, concerts, parades, the President, people, everything. They picket everything good and have the audacity to hold up hand made signs thanking God for the 9/11 terrorist attacks. But that's not all. They thank God for dead soldiers, for earthquakes, for school shootings. They picketed what was a Sandy Hook memorial or funeral thanking God for the shooter that came and killed elementary school children. It's horrible. It's hard to believe, but see for yourself:
This is just one of the many signs they parade around with in public, thanking God for the heroes who die defending our country. What's funny is that they are very careful to make sure they do nothing illegal and their right to free speech and peaceful protestation (or picketing) is protected by the constitution. Yet, they thank God when people die for defending their right to picket. And I don't mean funny as in "laugh out loud" funny. I mean funny as in sick and twisted.
Here is a photo of one of their horrible signs thanking God for a tragic terrorist attack along with a sweet little reminder that God hates us, while treading on the American flag.
I can only imagine that this is a reference to the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting. I know that they picketed it because they never fail to make their schedule public. They LOVE it when people know where they are going to be. They love being in the spotlight because it helps to spread God's "message."
A tweet from Shirley Phelps-Roper (daughter of the pastor and in charge of all church publicity) saying they will picket the elementary school. Picket the victims of the shooting. Not the shooter.
Why all this hate? Why do they believe God hates everyone and everything? Why do they think all bad things that happen are judgements from God and why do they believe we are being judged so harshly? Well, ladies and gentlemen, after everything I've learned about the church, what I find it all comes down to is this:
Yes, my friends. According to Westboro Baptist Church, God is our enemy (that phrase is on several of their signs) because of homosexuals. Although, as you can see by these signs held by Fred Phelps (their pastor who they basically believe to be second in command to God himself) they prefer to use a more vulgar word to refer to this group of people. And it is the only word they use to refer to them.
Apparently, God hates us and is punishing us so harshly because we live in a country that tolerates homosexuality. It doesn't matter how you personally feel about homosexuality or gay marriage. If you live in the United States and don't belong to their church, then God hates you because, as they say, you are one of the
This is how they refer to every straight person outside of their cult. If you're not gay, no matter your personal views, you're automatically an enabler. All it takes is living in the United States. Speaking as an enabler, this label is much less offensive and distressing than they intended it to be. They use the most vile and disgusting language and images (if you browse their various signs) to try and speak for God, but what they don't realize is that I will proudly bear any name that means I am not one of them. They don't understand that they are being counterproductive. Are they achieving what they want to achieve? They think they are warning us about our "impending doom" but they are just dishonoring God. Nothing more.
One of the saddest things about this horrible church is how they involve the young children. As you can see in the picture, they are taught these awful things young in life. They will take five-year-old children on pickets (even though people often get violently angry with them). These young kids hold up these signs and don't even know that they mean. I know this to be true because I watched a Louie Theroux documentary on them (The Most Hated Family in America) and he asked a little girl if she knew what the sign she was holding meant and the girl shook her head no. Shirley Phelps-Roper then tried to explain it to the child but she might as well have been talking to herself. There was no way the girl could have understood the complexity of the language she used. It's very sad the way they brainwash these children into believing lies about God.
I don't know why these people want to believe that God is some hateful, judgmental being sitting in heaven and torturing us with every tragedy he can think of, but that's not the impression I get when I read the Bible. Rather, I find him to be a loving, merciful and forgiving God that died for the whole entire world that we all might go to heaven; not just Westboro.
It sickens me that they twist the verses in the Bible and take them out of context to fit their distorted belief. It's awful to know that they genuinely believe that God delights in our misfortunes. They seemed to have skipped the numerous verses in the Bible that disprove everything they say is true.
I don't know why they like to think that everything bad is a judgment of God. That God does the bad things and none of the good things. They think God sent the planes into the world trade center and pentagon on September 11 of 2001 when I don't believe God had anything to do with it. They don't understand that God gave everyone free will. Even terrorists. If someone does something bad to someone else, they think God did it. They don't think the person sinned.
If someone is murdered, they don't believe it was the murderer making his own choice to do something bad to another person, though the Bible clearly states we are not to murder each other. No, the murderer is carrying out God's wishes. It is the unfortunate victim that is the sinful one.
Do they just flat out ignore verses like these?
For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.
- Jeremiah 29:11
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever
believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.- John 3:16
Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love.- 1 John 4:8
For he has not despised or abhorred the affliction of the afflicted, and
he has not hidden his face from him, but has heard, when he cried to
him. - Psalm 22:24
Just from these few verses, although there are many more like this, I don't see how they can call God hateful. The verse from Psalms contradicts their whole belief system in one sentence. They just don't get it.
They think everything that happens is a judgment of God and has nothing to do with our free will, unless, of course, that thing is homosexuality. Or being a soldier. Or not being part of their church. Their ignorance is astounding.
There is a book I highly recommend if you find yourself as interested in this cult as I am (not interested as in you would like to join them, interested on an intellectual standpoint). It is called Banished: Surviving my Years in the Westboro Baptist Church. I finished it in a total of two days, but I could have finished it in one. I literally had to make myself put it down so I could do things like sleep. Anyway, it's written by a young lady who grew up as a member of the church but was eventually banished. Banishing, by the way, is what they do to people who become smart enough to think by themselves and start to ask questions that contradict the church's doctrine. They banish you when they become afraid that you will prove them wrong.
If you're very interested in them, they have several websites that you are free to look through. They copyright all their material but allow anyone to use any of it for free for any reason. I'm not going to list their websites or anything, but if you google the church they will pop right up. They welcome you to write them emails if you have any questions about anything. They ask for "intelligent" questions. Of course, what is or is not intelligent is completely up to them. If they don't have an answer for your question, that's usually when it's deemed unintelligent and you'll be called stupid.
One last note before I end this post, if you are in the least bit anxious about the things Westboro says and think that maybe God does hate you, Westboro is wrong. You are wrong. God loves you. He loves me. He loves everyone. He created you. He didn't just snap his fingers and add another human being to the world, he specifically molded you into exactly what you are because he has a purpose and plan for your life. He didn't create you to hate you. You're his child and he loves you more than anything. The sooner Westboro understands that, the better. They don't speak for God. They have no possible way of knowing who goes to hell and who doesn't. They are disobeying God just by judging everyone. God clearly says not to judge others several times. He also says men look at the outside and he looks at the heart. Westboro missed that completely. They are also a perfect example. They harshly judge you by your outside, but God does not. He sees your heart and that is the only thing that truly matters.
All I have left to say is that, when I die, I sincerely hope that Westboro Baptist Church pickets my funeral. It will mean I did something in my life that I should be proud of.
I don't really watch courtroom dramas or follow real life trials, but, for some reason, I have found myself hooked on the Jodi Arias murder trial. I mean, what can I say? I was flipping through channels on my television one afternoon and happened upon the channel covering her trial and, since then, I haven't been able to stop watching it - not literally, figuratively.
If you're not familiar with the case, I suggest you read up on it. I'm not going to recount every detail in this post - as there's a whole lot of them - but I will go over the main issue.
So, basically, a man named Travis Alexander was found dead laying naked in his shower back in June of 2008. He had been stabbed 29 times, shot in the head, and his neck had been sliced from ear to ear. Right from the beginning, people were accusing his ex-girlfriend, Jodi Arias, of doing this to him and now she is on trial for murder and, if convicted, will receive the death penalty. Jodi has admitted to brutally killing Travis, but claims it was done in self defense.
I'm not buying that for a second.
I know that some people think she's innocent and that Travis was a monster. In fact, there is a whole website devoted to her innocence. But to me, it seems like most of what being's said there is speculation and the same people also had a site that claimed Casey Anthony was innocent so...yeah. That speaks for itself.
One of the main reasons I doubt Jodi is because she's a liar. She has been lying to detectives since day one. First she claimed she wasn't there and didn't do it, then she said she was there but two intruders did it, then she said she did do it but it was self defense. Sure, Jodi. We believe you this time. Not.
So much has happened during this trial that has been going on for over a month, I can't possibly recount everything.There has been witness after witness after witness. Jodi herself has been on the stand. She was on the stand for a long time. The news commentators say that she has been on the stand longer than anyone they have witnessed in their careers.
There are several reasons that I don't believe Jodi is innocent of first degree murder - not just because she's already admitted to lying about several things. Her behavior has been strange from the very beginning. Not only did she deny killing Travis, but she made up a ridiculous story of two intruders who came in and killed him but she was somehow able to escape and, get this, never called 911. Never went to any authority of any kind. Didn't tell anyone. She just drove away and left him there to die.
I don't know about you, but if intruders broke into a friend's house, and it was only me and my friend there and they killed my friend and I got away, the first thing I would do is call the police, especially if I wasn't 100% sure that my friend was dead, which Jodi claims was the case.
Now that she's admitted to being the killer, things are a little different. Jodi claims self defense, but there isn't any evidence to suggest that he was ever violent with her or anyone else. Everyone else that knew him says he wasn't abusive or violent, even his other girlfriends. They all say that they always felt safe around him. Jodi is the only one who says he behaved this way and, ironically, she's the only one who needs that to be true. She says he attacked her when she dropped his camera. He was so angry she had to kill him. I think if dropping his camera was enough to make him so violently angry that he could have killed her and the only way out was to kill him, then someone else he knew at some time in his life would have seen at least a sign of such uncontrollable aggression. But, strangely, no one ever did. All we have in respect to him being abusive is Jodi's word and she tends to lie a lot. People also say that, at one point, Jodi slashed the tires on Travis' car. He knew about that. He didn't try to kill her then or get violent. So slashing his tires is fine, but don't drop his camera or he'll kill you? I don't think so.
Not only that, but Jodi doesn't have any injuries from the abuse she claimed happened. She would tell people of the physical abuse she had received and where she had been hurt, but the wounds always seemed to have already healed so she couldn't show them to anybody. There was one injury, though, a broken finger that she was able to show the jury. She claimed that her finger broke after Travis kicked her hand. She never went to go see a doctor about her "broken" finger.
I put broken in quotation marks because I don't believe it was ever broken. If she did in fact injure her finger, I think it's more likely that it was while she was stabbing Travis one of the twenty-nine times.
Take a look at the video below*. There are a couple of foul words in it, just to warn you, but if you watch the whole video, Jodi's injured finger is being discussed. She can be clearly seen showing a bent finger to the jury but if you watch up to around the five minute mark, her left hand (the one with the injured ring finger) is shown several times and I see no bend at all. Do you?
And I find it hard to believe that after being body slammed, thrown to the ground and kicked by such a large guy that an injured finger is all she has to show for it. Her body must be super resilient.
I don't want to post any pictures because I don't want to get into copyright issues, but if you look, you can clearly see that Travis is quite a bit bigger than Jodi is. It's unreal the amount of injuries she doesn't have if he was as violent as often as Jodi claims.
This injury thing is important because it will help the jury decide if he was violent with her in his last moments. Jodi says after she dropped his camera, he attacked her. She was pushed and thrown around and body slammed twice. No injuries to show from this attack. Just the injured finger that happened a few days prior.
Another thing to pay attention to is her behavior. Ever since she killed Travis she has not been acting like a victim of abuse that had to kill someone in self defense, she has been acting like she loves the attention. Go look up her mug shot. She's smiling in it. She said she smiled because she was thinking "what would Travis do?" Yeah, right. My dog could come up with a better lie than that.
Her interrogation videos are strange, too. If you watch them, she just doesn't look like someone who cares about her friend being dead. She's more concerned about things like her makeup and whether or not she's being recorded. In fact, when she was first arrested, the first thing she said was "Do I have time to get my makeup?" She is not acting like a victim of abuse at all.
In one of her interrogation videos, she's in the room by herself. She starts singing. She sings a song called Here With Me by Dido and then she sings O Holy Night. In the middle of the latter song - and remember she's in here alone - she stops singing and starts laughing. Legitimately giggling! Then she starts singing again. Is that the behavior of an abuse who was forced to kill someone so violently in self defense? No, it's not.
Besides the fact of all this strange behavior, she took the time to cover her tracks after the crime. She tried to get rid of the evidence. Before the killing, they were taking naked pictures with each other. The last photo of him alive is him naked in the shower. She's dressed now. After she murdered him, she deleted some pictures, put the camera in the washer and ran it. She disposed of the knife and the gun and they haven't been found. She put the license plate on her car upside down. She called his cell phone after she knew he was dead and left a message. Then she drove to another man's house and made out with him. She's guilty.
She is so good at playing the innocent little girl, though. She's all sweet and polite, and it's just horrifying to know that hidden underneath the sweet, innocent girl lies a cold blooded killer. But it's the truth. She was interviewed by 48 Hours and you can watch the video below. You can see her smile and laugh the whole time. She is loving this attention! She's not acting like she misses Travis or is even sorry that he's dead. She gave this interview during the time she claimed intruders killed Travis so it's full of pathetic lies and she plays them so convincingly, you have to think that this can't be all she's lying about. If she lied about this, she lied about something else. I think her self defense story is as fake as the story she told in this interview. Just watch it. She doesn't look like an innocent victim here.
There are several other reasons I think she's guilty as well. I mean, this trial has been going on for four months and every witness has contributed to the case and there is so much to go over that I can't cover nearly all of it. You watch the trial coverage on HLN. It's pretty interesting.
Other factors of the case are that Jodi says she got the gun out of his closet during the attack, but everyone who knows Travis says he didn't own a gun. Even Jodi said he didn't own one during her interrogation, but I guess she changed her mind when she decided to claim self defense. Something fishy, though, that happened a few days before the she murdered Travis is that a gun was stolen from Jodi's grandparents' house. Just a gun. Just one out of the several different kinds they owned. It just happened to be the same kind of gun used to shoot Travis. Jodi had been at her grandparents' home around the time of the robbery. This is looking more and more like premeditation.
It seems as though Jodi was holding the camera while she brutally killed Travis because there are some accidental photos on it of the floor and the ceiling and one of Travis after he's been murdered and Jodi's foot in the same picture. Travis is naked. Jodi, as seen from the picture, at least has on socks and a pair of pants.
Something interesting, though, is that these pictures are date and time stamped. There is a photo of the ceiling which Jodi says is a picture the camera took as she dropped it. So it's a picture that tells us when Travis attacked her then there is a picture of him after he's been murdered. These two pictures, before and after the attack, are 62 seconds apart. That is not enough time for everything Jodi says took place to have taken place.
Other witnesses that the defense has called up hasn't really helped their case, in my opinion. They called up a psychologist that had seen Jodi four times during one year and gave her a diagnosis of PTSD but I think that discussion was a waste of time because if she does have PTSD (even though I don't find the psychologist to be very credible) I don't see how that helps prove self defense as she would have developed the disorder after the killing.
They've also had a domestic violence expert on the stand who appears to be buddy-buddy with the defense team. She was very rude to the prosecutor while on the stand and, frankly, I don't think her testimony should be given much weight to the final outcome.
Just to add another piece of evidence against Jodi, while on the stand, Jodi says she shot Travis in the bathroom. But apparently she told the domestic violence expert that she shot him in the closet. Make up our mind!
Anyway, there is so much more to this case out there, every little thing just shows how guilty she is. I am just going over the evidence that I find the most damning. But explore the case yourself and see what you think.
****
Jodi Arias is tweeting from jail. Her twitter account is Jodiannarias. Sometimes she tweets about the case, which is mostly just insulting the prosecutor and HLN, but mostly it's about her website where she is selling her artwork. Seriously? Not much of a victim, is she? Please, please, please, don't give her money. She is a violent, cold blooded killer who deserves the death penalty. Not money. Don't support murderers.
****
If you want to know my opinions on this case as it continues, you can follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/OpinionMiss
I will be tweeting what I think as I watch live coverage of the trial. Hope to see you there!
It's 2013 and the world is still here. That can be good or bad news depending on whether you're a glass half full or glass half empty type. Anyway, I haven't been around to post on my blog recently because life outside of the computer has been crazy. But, I'm back now. And I thought I would start off my blogging year with a post about this gun control issue that people have been getting pretty serious about since the elementary school shooting. I don't know that you care about my position on this issue, but if you don't care, don't read it.
School shootings. Wow. That phrase looks and sounds terrible, like it shouldn't be a real thing. But it is a real thing. It is a very real thing. It makes you want to do something about it. But what can you do? The fact is, there will probably always be school shootings because there will always be messed up people. Now, in short, I'm all for taking care of criminals and getting them off the streets, but I don't think taking away guns is going to fix that problem. At all.
Gun does not equal criminal. We can't punish everybody in the country because some people out there use guns in ways they shouldn't be used. I mean, think about it, if someone really wants to kill someone, is the lack of a gun going to stop them from committing murder? There are plenty of ways to kill someone without using a gun. Taking away guns from people may reduce the number or crimes committed with a gun, but it won't reduce crime.
And let's be logical here; criminals are criminals because they break the law. If they want to murder someone with a gun, they are going to. Murder is against the law but people are still murdered . Gun control will make it harder to get a gun, but it won't make it impossible.
I'm a firm believer in the constitution. That doesn't mean that I don't think nothing ever needs to change, but I don't think it needs to change unnecessarily. The second amendment clearly states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. This is a day and age when we need to stand up for rights, not consent to them being taken away. We give the government control of our guns, we are giving them another piece of our liberty. We are supposed to be a free country but we are slowly having our freedoms taken away.
If we take guns away, not only are criminals who want a gun going to ignore the law, but innocent people will have lost a way to defend themselves. If someone has a gun pulled on them after we take away the right to own a gun, that person is basically doomed to die if the one with the gun decides to shoot. Hypothetically, what if one of the teachers at the Sandy Hook elementary school had had a gun on them? They could have shot the gunman down and maybe the number of lives lost would have been lessened.
The founding fathers were all for citizens owning guns. George Washington said "a free people ought to be armed" and Benjamin Franklin said "those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety," and, frankly, I agree with them.
Instead of pretending that gun control will fix the problem, why don't we focus on the underlying issues? Why are people killing each other? Why all this gun related crime? We should focus more on things like mental illnesses, parenting, education and the things that shape people into who they are. We need to work on the reasons people are committing crimes, not taking away the tools they use to commit them.
This is just my opinion here, but I promise you that gun control will not stop crime. There may a drop in gun related crimes, but there will not be a drop in crime. We need to understand that guns aren't the problem: people are. Guns don't do anything wrong: people do. Guns are a tool that are very useful and necessary when used in the ways they are intended to be used. Anything can be abused, though, and used wrongly.
Instead of whining about it, though, why don't we work more on educating people about guns and gun safety? Why don't we stress the importance of using guns wisely? Granted, this won't stop the criminals from using them, but neither will gun control.
You know I hate bullying. I have two previous posts about how terrible I think it is. I'm sad to say that this is yet another post about bullying. I don't mean to keep posting about it, but things keep happening that I can't just ignore. This post is going to be a little different, though. This post is about Amanda Todd's story. If you are not familiar with her story, watch the video posted below.
This girl, Amanda Todd, ended up killing herself. No other bullying story I have addressed ends with the victim committing suicide. I hope that this shows people how serious bullying is. Though I hate what she went through and am terribly upset with the people who treated her that way, I am mostly going to address how people are responding to the story. Yes, I will talk about what happened to her but I am mostly discussing what people are saying about her now and what is currently happening because it makes me sick to my stomach.
Many, many people feel sympathy for Amanda and are treating her memory with respect, which is very admirable and those people make me proud. Those are the sort of people we need in this world. If you are among that group of people, thank you so much. You are amazing. The rest of you, however, should be downright disgusted with yourselves. I am disgusted by you.
Why is that, you ask? Anyone who takes a story of someone's suicide and turns it into a joke, something to laugh at and not be taken seriously is someone who does not deserve the tiniest amount of respect and will get absolutely none from me. If you are one of those people, shame on you. You are among the lowest of the low.
You would be surprised how many people are doing this. Her story has become an internet joke which makes me ashamed of my country and fellow human beings. Sometimes I really hate people. Some people have written the most vile things about her, saying that we shouldn't care that she's dead because she made some bad choices. How messed up that? You shouldn't care if someone lost their life because they weren't perfect? If we all lived by that rule, no one would ever care if someone died. She doesn't deserve sympathy or respect because she did things that were wrong? What a stupid thing to think. Amanda was just a child, barely in high school. If you saw the video, all she really wanted was a friend. She was all alone and was desperate for someone to notice her and be friends with her, so, yeah, she made some mistakes because people were treating her nice and like they cared about her. Later, those people turned out to be jerks, but that's not her fault.
What really shocks me is that she makes a couple of mistakes and gets more hate than women who sell their bodies and do extremely immoral things on a daily basis. She is getting more hate than the men who used her. More hate than the guy who sent her picture around the internet.
I am not exaggerating about the hate. Just look at some of these comments from Youtube. Don't worry, I will not post their usernames even though they don't deserve that much consideration. I am going to dash out all the curse words because some people don't think they can get their point across without using them.
"Aww boo fooping who. She did it to her slef she was stupid for doing it
maybe instead of ----- about it she could have forgotten now look
she's dead and people treat her like some hero she brought it all on her
slef. I have no pity for stupidity."
".....this girl isn't the angel all these people try
and make her out to be. Of course she didn't deserve to die, but she
certainly doesn't deserve attention or respect."
"......she decided to flash people. She brought it all upon herself. She doesn't deserve any empathy."
"So the real question to ask is, why does this girl deserve any more attention than the guy that died as you read this comment?"
"I hope she rots.It's what she deserves."
"----- is dead. She deserved it. Hope she's rotting in hell."
"One mistake? Her whole life was a mistake. Glad she died."
I'm dead serious when I say that these aren't even the worst of the bunch. If you authored any of theses disgusting comments then you probably should re-evaluate your life. You make yourself out to be something of horrible jerk that doesn't deserve any respect.
Look, sometimes people make mistakes and do things that they shouldn't do. Even you. But does that mean that they lose all respect as a human being and their life isn't valuable anymore? Does that mean that we don't need to care that if they take their own life? Does that mean that people are idiots for caring? Does that mean we don't need to care if they were bullied? No. Not at all.
No one who has died deserves more or less attention than another dead person, but it doesn't mean it's wrong to care and let people know that you care, especially if you are aware of their death. So, in response to the person who wrote: "why does this girl deserve any more attention than the guy that died as you read this comment?" She doesn't. But I am aware of her death and I care about her. Therefore, I am giving her some attention because I think she's important and deserves sympathy and respect. Tell me the name of the guy who died while I read the comment and I will show sympathy and respect for him, as well.
So, you may be asking, you saw a couple of idiots posting comments on youtube and that means everyone's an idiot? No. I wish it was just a couple of jerks posting their opinions on it, but that's not it. It's that plus the people who thought it would be funny to make internet memes about her. I mean, if that doesn't illustrate how disgustingly low and immature people are then I don't know what does.
Don't believe me? Here are a few of them.
Again, these are not the worst of them. I couldn't bring myself to post the most horrible ones that I saw. If you made a meme like this, or you even think they are funny and/or clever, you are an embarrassment to society.
If you don't care about Amanda Todd or you take pleasure about laughing at the suicide of a 15 year old girl, or you think that caring about Amanda means that we don't care about anyone else who has died, you have a lot to learn. Just because I care about Amanda Todd doesn't mean I don't care about other suicide victims or anyone else. It's possible to care about them all. I don't know why you have to compare her death to other ones and us it to justify your cruelness, that's plain sick. Caring about this young girl does not mean I don't care about anyone else.
What this all goes down to is bullying. Bullying is wrong and it's very serious. It's wrong to bully people while they're alive and it's wrong and sometimes even more vile and disgusting to do it after they've died, which is what is happening right now. Why can't society grow up and mature to care about a young, fifteen year old girl who was viciously attacked for things that many, many people have done, who was so lost and alone that the only way out she saw was suicide? Why can't we care about her? Why can't some people be less of a monster? Why do you have to show everyone what a terrible excuse for a human being you are?
If you got bullied and then killed yourself, would you want people making internet memes about you and laughing about your death? I didn't think so. That is so disrespectful.
I am very interested in human psychology and plan on majoring in psychology at the school I attend. Clinical depression is very real and suicide is no joke. You have no right to poke fun at this young, beautiful girl. You have no idea what she went through or what was going on inside her head. All you know is what was posted on the internet. You don't know the whole story.
When people get clinically depressed and have anxiety disorders or panic attack disorders, they can't think rationally. Many times, suicide is the only out that they see. It's psychological, not selfishness. If you can't give her the respect she deserves, if you can't care that she's gone despite her mistakes, if you don't care that she was bullied to death, then you don't deserve respect. You need to understand the psychology of suicide and depression before you go around making judgement calls and making an internet joke out of a dear girls' life. This goes above and beyond what choices she made. This about her life.
For those of you who hate on her and mock her, shame on you. You have nothing to be proud of.
R.I.P Amanda Todd, sweet girl. You are loved and missed. <3
Most people are familiar with the Harry Potter controversy as it's been around for a long time. It's not as big of a topic as it once was what with all the books and movies having come to an end, but people are still reading them and watching the movies. I decided that, even though it's late in the debate, I would post my opinion about it because it's my blog and I can do what I want.
I'll tell you straight out that I actually used to be on the side of the argument that claimed they were evil books that taught witchcraft but that all changed once I actually read the books. I'm not going to say anything against the people who feel that they aren't good books and use real witchcraft because I used to think that way and I know people who still think that way. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and everyone has the right to voice their opinion.
Now, I'm not going to just go on a tangent about Harry Potter and how it's not evil like some people claim because that would be long and confusing to type out and probably wouldn't end up in any organized fashion. I found a specific attack on the books to which I will be responding. That being said, this post will be longer than my others but bear with me.
I know this article I will be addressing is pretty much old news, but it's still out there for people to read so I wanted to put something out there to sort of beg people not to pay any attention to it.
Before I get into the actual article, there are a couple of things I need to point out about it. First of all, it's titled A Letter From an Ex-Witch Writing About Harry Potter. A lot of you may already know about this letter and know the all the reasons that it isn't credible. I'm not asking anyone to read this. I'm just putting it out there because I want to write my opinion, too. If you haven't read it and would like to so you can follow along with this blog post, just click on the link.
Okay, I'm assuming we all know this, but just to remind you, when reading something like this one should always figure out how reliable the source is. From what I found, the source is not reliable at all. If you didn't notice, the letter has no author listed. We have no idea who wrote this. Someone did but apparently thought it was unnecessary to say who they were which authors and credible people rarely do. That is the first clue that this source may not be one we can trust.
I also noticed that the author (whoever it is) listed no sources at the end of the letter and only mentioned, like, on source in the body that is a film called Harry Potter: Witchcraft Repackaged. I have seen this video and it's as ridiculous as the letter.
This letter is posted on a website called pacinst.com. They got this letter from a website called harrypottermagic.org, and they did link to it but the page no longer exists. I looked around on pacinst.com and found that it is not a reliable source. There are no names associated with the site, no sources listed on it, just other random articles that look much the same as the one about Harry Potter.
Now we come to the letter itself and what is written inside. Let me just tell you now, I think the whole thing is nonsense from start to finish and there are so many problems with it, we would be here forever if I were to attempt to address them all. And that doesn't include the grammar and punctuation errors. So, I am only going to address the ones I find the most outrageous.
As I read this letter, I counted at least four times the author mentioned they were a former witch but there could be more. So, what? you may be asking. Well, the issue there is that, really, we don't need to be continuously reminded of the fact. Tell us once, maybe twice, that you were a former witch but when you start reminding us four or five times, you become less credible. I have my doubts that this person was ever an actual witch simply because they said they were a former witch too many times. You may think that is a tad harsh, but think of it this way: if you are talking to doctor, how many times do you need him to mention he's a doctor? Never, right? You'll probably already knows he's a doctor and if he tells you, like, five times throughout the conversation that he's a doctor ("and I know this because I'm a doctor...being a doctor, I think that...well, I'm a doctor, so....") then you might start to think that something was a little odd.
One thing I would like to address is the fact that the author says the books teach witchcraft and are witchcraft manuals. This letter was written when only four of the seven books had been published. I don't know about you, but even after reading all seven books, I couldn't do witchcraft if I tried, so J.K. Rowling is not a very good teacher. After making the accusatory statements, the letter writer says, "I know this because I was once very
much a part of that world" (Okay, who else started singing Little Mermaid after that? :D ). The author doesn't know this because he/she has read the books and studied their origins, the author "knows" this because they were, maybe, once a witch themselves. I don't even know if this person has ever opened a Harry Potter book.
"As a former witch, I can speak with authority
when I say that I have examined the works of Rowling and that
the Harry Potter books are training manuals for the occult." As someone who has actually read the series, I can speak with authority when I say that these books are a work of fiction and not any kind of manual at all. If they teach anything, it's unconditional and sacrificial love, standing up for what is good and right even when it doesn't seem worth it, the love and power of family and friends and very many other qualities that I would be pleased to see practiced in any individual. But not magic. I didn't see any teaching of that at all.
This ignorant letter writer barely says anything about what goes on inside the story to prove their point. What they do is pick on the vocabulary. They take a couple of words that they heard were in the story that happen to be real words and use them to try and prove the books are evil. What that proves, however, is that J.K. Rowling researched before writing and I, generally, do not have a problem with that. The words this person mentions are in the series, it's true, but many of them happen to be character names and J.K. Rowling does not define any of them. If she does, it's a definition she made up to fit her story, not the real one. Suffice it to say, many of the kids who read these books are not even going to realize the words are real unless they go look them up, but not many children look up character names to see what "evil" meaning hides behind it.
I almost laughed out loud at the next part of the letter where the author uses the title of the books to support their claim. If they wanted stronger evidence, there are plenty of things they could have pulled out of the story, but, no, they chose to go for the title. Probably because they haven't bothered to read the books. This person actually wrote, "The titles of the books should be warning
enough to make us realize how satanic and anti-christ these books
are. The afore mentioned title of the first book, "Harry
Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone", was a real give away. The second book was called "Harry
Potter and the Chamber of Secrets", while the third book
was entitled "Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban."
Nothing could be more obvious than that Harry Potter books are
pure witchcraft and of the devil." If the most obvious piece of evidence this person has is the titles of the books, their argument is even weaker than I originally thought. Titles can be misleading. I could write a book about children who play on the playground while eating some yummy ice cream and getting along and title it I Love Satan if I wanted to. I'm just saying, this person needs a heck of a lot more evidence than the title if they want anyone to think they even deserve to be listened to.
This person goes on to say that having Voldemort being called He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named is evil because in the real occult there is a "nameless one." But, I would like to point out that having a character that people don't speak the name of does not necessarily prove the books are of the devil and teach children witchcraft. J.K. Rowling, even if she does take some ideas from real witchcraft and twist them to fit her story, is not teaching children that these are okay and that they should endeavor to be part of the occult. It's okay to research your writing. That's a big part of what makes it any good. After reading these books, children don't generally go looking to join the occult. They just put them down and pick up a new series to read.
And the part of the letter that says public schools are planning to use Harry Potter magic in schools and become witchcraft training centers??? Yeah, I couldn't keep a straight face at that part, either.
After saying that, the author quotes a verse from the Bible and quotes some of the things that a couple of children have said about the books. Let me pause right here and tell you something: I'm a Christian. I have been for a very long time. I believe the things that God says, and I honestly don't believe that he would hate the Harry Potter books. The Bible verse this person quotes is Acts 19:18-20. All it mentions is that a bunch of people came together to worship God, some of them from the occult who burned their books. That's great. I understand Jesus disapproves of real witchcraft and these were real witches, not Harry Potter fiction.
The next part, with the children's quotes, is really not that big of a deal. If kids really did say those things, for the most part, it's okay. Often, after finishing an enjoyable book series, kids are still wrapped up in the story and imagine themselves as part of it. This is called imagination and one of the greatest qualities that humans posses. I'm not denying that literature can influence the way we think and what we believe, but, these are children. They are vulnerable. That is why parents need to need to be involved in the things their children are reading, watching and the music they are listening too. If your child is far too easily influenced and can't understand the difference between fiction and reality, maybe they shouldn't read the books. If parents discuss the books with their children, talk about the differences of fiction and truth, discuss the issues, then they can be a part of ensuring that their kids don't turn to a world of evil. I do think the books are intense, though, and I wouldn't suggest that young children read them. But that's not because I think they are evil. It's because some aspects of the story are too dark and tense for little kids.
This letter goes on to say that there are millions of resources available to people who want to start practicing Wicca, and there are. But Harry Potter is not the reason for that. Those sources would be out there without Harry Potter. Anyone who thinks the magic in Harry Potter is similar to real magic doesn't know much about either real magic or Harry Potter, and I think it's safe to say that the author of this letter is ignorant of Harry Potter.
Another reason I am fairly confident that this person has never read the books is what they wrote next: "But is it just fantasy literature like
Snow White and Cinderella? In the Harry Potter video, cult expert
Caryl Matrisciana points out that in the older stories, evil
never prevails." This doesn't help prove their point at all, because, as anyone who has read the books knows because it's extremely obvious, evil doesn't prevail in these stories. Good prevails. Of course, this letter was written when there were only four books, and Voldemort had just returned at the end of it, but, obviously, there was more to come. And, if we're honest, in the real world, good doesn't always prevail. It's not always about who comes out on top, but how the good people behave, what their motivation is and what they believe.
Except for a couple more paragraphs that basically tell us, again, why Harry Potter is evil, the letter has come to an end. After reading it, I was not convinced that Harry Potter was evil, I was convinced that the letter didn't know what they were talking about.
I do believe that people need to be careful about what they read, and if you're too easily influenced, stay away from Harry Potter. But what the book teaches are very good morals and values that are actually very Christian. I'm not saying everyone should read it, but if the reason you're not reading it is because of letters like this one then I would say you might want to give it a chance.
With all that being said, I acknowledge that the time for this kind of post has passed since the debate isn't very prominent anymore, but that letter is easy to find and anyone who has internet can still read it and be influenced by it. I just wanted to put this out there for people so they will be able to see how illogical that letter is if they haven't read the Harry Potter already and are trying to research it to see if they want to.
I hope that this was helpful, and, in all honesty, I do the think the movies place more of an emphasis on the magic than the books do, but I don't think it's enough to lure children into the occult. I don't like the movies, but that's not because I think they're evil, it's because I think they're stupid.
